Please read our important disclaimers before using this content
"My ex-wife never had a problem with me going out with my friends."
"Your sister thinks you're overreacting about this."
"Sarah from work was so understanding when I told her about our fight."
If your partner routinely brings third parties into your relationship—comparing you to ex-partners, recruiting family members to take sides, or creating rivalries with friends or colleagues—you're experiencing triangulation, a manipulation tactic that keeps you off-balance, competing for approval, and prevents direct, authentic communication. Triangulation is one component of a broader pattern of narcissistic abuse tactics designed to maintain control.
What Is Triangulation?
Triangulation is a manipulation tactic where a person brings a third party into a two-person dynamic to:
- Avoid direct communication
- Create competition or jealousy
- Gain validation or allies
- Destabilize the primary relationship
- Maintain control through division
The term comes from family systems therapy, where Murray Bowen described triangulation as a way to reduce anxiety in a two-person system by involving a third party. In healthy contexts, this might be seeking mediation or support.
In manipulative contexts, triangulation is weaponized to create insecurity, competition, and control.
The Clinical Foundation: Triangulation as Power and Control
Research on intimate partner manipulation identifies triangulation as a core tactic in maintaining power and control over a partner.1 Studies published in the Journal of Interpersonal Violence found that emotional manipulation tactics like triangulation were present in relationships characterized by coercive control.2 Research on narcissistic abuse demonstrates that triangulation serves to destabilize victims' confidence and maintain the abuser's power through creating interpersonal competition and isolation.3
Triangulation serves specific strategic purposes:
Creating competition: By introducing real or implied rivals, the manipulator ensures their partner never feels secure in the relationship. This insecurity makes the partner more compliant and less likely to assert boundaries or leave.
Dividing relationships: The manipulator works to isolate their target from support systems by creating distrust. "Your mother always takes your side" or "Your friends don't understand our relationship" gradually erodes the target's confidence in their own support network.
Avoiding accountability: By outsourcing validation to third parties ("My therapist says you're the problem"), the manipulator never has to take responsibility for their behavior or engage in genuine two-person problem-solving.
Maintaining dominance: When you're constantly defending yourself against what "everyone else thinks," you're in a perpetually reactive position. The manipulator sets the terms of engagement, chooses the third parties, and controls the narrative—keeping you one-down in the relationship power dynamic.
Research on narcissistic abuse identifies triangulation as a predictable pattern in relationships with personality-disordered individuals, who use third parties to regulate their own self-esteem while destabilizing their partner's sense of reality.4
Common Forms of Triangulation
1. The Comparison Triangle
Constantly comparing you to others:
Ex-partners:**
- "My ex-wife used to cook dinner every night"
- "I never had these problems with my previous girlfriend"
- "Sarah would have understood this"
Friends or family:
- "Why can't you be more like your sister?"
- "Mike's wife doesn't complain about his work hours"
- "Your friend Amy seems so much more easygoing"
Hypothetical ideal:
- "A normal person would..."
- "Most wives would be grateful for..."
- "Anyone else would see this differently"
Purpose: Keep you feeling inadequate, competitive, and trying to measure up to a shifting standard.
2. The Confidante Triangle
Sharing relationship issues with a third party instead of you:
"I talked to my mother about our finances. She agrees you're being unreasonable."
"I mentioned your behavior to my therapist. She says you might have borderline personality disorder."
"Tom from work thinks I should leave you."
Purpose:**
- Avoid direct communication
- Gain allies before you know there's a conflict
- Make you feel ganged up on
- Outsource relationship decisions to inappropriate third parties
3. The Rivalry Triangle
Creating jealousy or competition:
Opposite sex friends:**
- "Sarah from work is so funny. We have such great conversations."
- Excessive time/attention to someone who could be a romantic threat
- Comparing your physical appearance to theirs
- Inappropriate emotional intimacy that exceeds the primary relationship
Same sex friends/family:
- Creating competition between you and their mother
- Pitting siblings against each other
- Setting up rivalry between you and their best friend
Purpose: Keep you insecure and competing for their attention and approval.
4. The Flying Monkey Triangle
Recruiting others to communicate for them or pressure you:
"My mother thinks you should apologize."
"I talked to your sister. Even she thinks you're being unreasonable."
"The kids are upset that you won't let us spend Christmas together."
Purpose:**
- Avoid direct accountability
- Apply social pressure
- Make you feel isolated or like the problem
- Control you through relationships you value
Real-World Case Examples
Case 1: Romantic Triangulation - The Ex Who Never Left
Sarah's story:
Sarah's husband Mark constantly referenced his ex-wife during conflicts: "Jennifer never complained about my work schedule." "My ex was fine with how I managed money." "Jennifer understood I needed alone time with my friends."
When Sarah expressed hurt, Mark recruited his mother: "I told my mom you're uncomfortable with me mentioning Jennifer. Mom says you're being insecure and controlling."
The triangulation pattern:
- Mark used the ex-wife as an idealized comparison to keep Sarah feeling inadequate
- He recruited his mother as a validator, creating a 2-against-1 dynamic
- Sarah found herself competing with a ghost—someone whose actual behavior she could never verify
- The constant comparison prevented authentic discussion about what Sarah and Mark actually needed from each other
The impact: Sarah spent three years trying to measure up to an impossible standard. She became hypervigilant about any complaint, fearing she'd be labeled "difficult" like she assumed Jennifer wasn't. She didn't realize until therapy that Mark's ex-wife had left him precisely because of these same controlling behaviors—the "understanding" ex was a fiction.
Case 2: Family Triangulation - Playing Children Against Each Other
David's story:
David's mother routinely compared him to his brother: "Your brother visits every week. Why can't you be more like him?" When David set boundaries about holiday expectations, his mother told his brother: "David says he's too busy for family. Can you talk to him?"
His brother, fed a one-sided narrative, called David: "Mom's really hurt. She's getting older. Can't you just make an effort?"
The triangulation pattern:
- The mother avoided direct communication about her expectations
- She recruited one child to pressure the other
- She created competition between siblings for "favorite child" status
- David was positioned as the problem without his perspective being heard
The impact: David felt guilty and confused. His brother's call suggested David was being unreasonable, but David's boundary (visiting twice monthly instead of weekly) was actually healthy. The triangulation prevented David and his mother from having an authentic conversation about expectations. It also damaged David's relationship with his brother, who became an unwitting flying monkey.
Case 3: Co-Parenting Triangulation - Children as Pawns
Michelle's story:
Michelle's ex-husband Tom used their 10-year-old daughter as a messenger: "Tell Mom she needs to pay for your soccer uniform." He shared adult financial grievances: "Daddy can't afford to take you to Disneyland because Mommy took too much money in the divorce."
He recruited his new girlfriend: "Emma is so much better with the kids than your mom ever was. Don't you have more fun at my house?"
The triangulation pattern:
- Tom avoided direct co-parent communication with Michelle
- He inappropriately burdened their daughter with adult financial information
- He created competition between households using the new girlfriend
- He positioned himself as the victim of Michelle's "unreasonableness"
The impact: Their daughter developed anxiety, afraid to tell her mother about fun times at Dad's house (fearing it would hurt Mom) and afraid to tell her father about missing her mother (fearing it would hurt Dad). She became the emotional caretaker of both parents. Michelle documented the triangulation and eventually received a custody modification limiting Tom's ability to communicate through their child.
5. The Scapegoat Triangle
Blaming a third party for their behavior:
"My mother makes me feel guilty if I don't visit every Sunday."
"My boss is so demanding I'm too stressed to deal with your complaints."
"The kids need so much that I don't have energy for you."
Purpose:** Deflect accountability for choices onto others while positioning themselves as powerless victims.
6. The Referee Triangle
Constantly involving others to mediate or judge:
"Let's ask your father what he thinks about this."
"We should bring this up in couples therapy." (As a way to avoid direct communication in the meantime)
"I posted about this anonymously online. Want to hear what people said?"
Purpose:**
- Avoid authentic two-person communication
- Gain validation from authority figures
- Make you wrong through proxy
- Prevent intimacy through constant third-party involvement
Why Triangulation Works: The Psychology
Creates Cognitive Dissonance
When someone you trust says your partner is right and you're wrong, you experience discomfort between:
- Your own perceptions and feelings
- The perspective of someone you respect
Most people resolve this discomfort by doubting themselves rather than doubting the triangulated third party.5
Activates Insecurity
Humans are wired for belonging and comparison. Triangulation:
- Triggers fear of abandonment
- Activates competitive instincts
- Makes you question your worth
- Keeps you trying to prove your value
Prevents Direct Communication
Healthy relationships require:
- Direct expression of needs and concerns
- Two-person problem-solving
- Mutual accountability
Triangulation shortcuts all of this by:
- Outsourcing difficult conversations
- Pre-establishing that you're wrong before discussion even happens
- Making every issue involve third parties who shouldn't be involved
Maintains Power Imbalance
When you're:
- Always being compared and found wanting
- Competing for their attention
- Outnumbered by recruited allies
- Defending yourself to people who shouldn't be involved
You're in a perpetually one-down position, which is exactly where a controlling partner wants you.
Triangulation in Divorce and Co-Parenting
Triangulation doesn't end when the relationship does. It often intensifies. During divorce and custody proceedings, flying monkeys become a primary vehicle for triangulation—recruited friends and family members who carry the narcissist's narrative to court and to you.
Child Triangulation
The messenger: "Tell your mother she needs to pay for half of your soccer fees."
Using children to relay messages instead of direct co-parent communication.
The confidante: "Daddy is so sad that Mommy won't let him see you more."
Sharing adult relationship problems inappropriately with children.
The ally: "Don't you think Mommy is being unfair?"
Recruiting children to take sides or validate the triangulating parent's perspective.
The competition: "Daddy's house is more fun than Mommy's, isn't it?"
Creating rivalry between households or parents.
Impact on children:
- Forced to choose sides
- Inappropriate access to adult conflicts
- Emotional burden of parent's feelings
- Loyalty conflicts
- Disrupted attachment to targeted parent
Extended Family Triangulation
"My mother says you're poisoning the children against me."
"Your father agrees I should have primary custody."
"The kids' therapist says you're causing the alienation."
Recruiting grandparents, relatives, or even professionals as validators or flying monkeys.
Professional Triangulation
Therapists: "Our marriage counselor says you're the one refusing to compromise." (When couples counseling is contraindicated for abuse)
Attorneys: "My lawyer says you'll never get custody."
Custody evaluators: Feeding false narratives to custody evaluators before you have opportunity to present your perspective.
Purpose:
- Gain authority-figure validation
- Intimidate you
- Control legal outcomes
- Make professionals into unwitting flying monkeys
The Gaslighting Component of Triangulation
Triangulation becomes particularly insidious when combined with gaslighting—the manipulation tactic that makes you doubt your own perceptions and reality.
How triangulation enables gaslighting:
"Everyone agrees with me, so you must be wrong": When your partner claims "everyone" thinks you're overreacting, being too sensitive, or misunderstanding the situation, they're using social proof to make you doubt your own judgment. But "everyone" usually means:
- One or two people who heard only your partner's version
- People who have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo
- Flying monkeys who weren't given enough information to make an informed judgment
Reality distortion through multiple voices: It's psychologically harder to maintain confidence in your perspective when it seems like multiple people disagree with you. The manipulator uses this to their advantage: "My mother thinks you're being unreasonable. My therapist says you have control issues. My best friend says I should leave you." This creates the illusion of consensus when actually there's been no fair presentation of both sides.
The isolation effect: When everyone around you seems to agree with your partner's narrative, you feel increasingly isolated and begin to distrust yourself. "Maybe I really am crazy. Maybe everyone else can see something I can't." This self-doubt is precisely the goal—it makes you more dependent on the manipulator's version of reality.
Documenting reality vs. narrative: One powerful way to combat gaslighting through triangulation is documentation. Write down what actually happened, what was said, and what third parties actually know. Often you'll discover significant gaps between reality and the narrative being sold.
The Impact on Targets: What Triangulation Does to You
Isolation
Effective triangulation gradually isolates you from your support system:
- You stop confiding in friends because you're not sure whose side they're on
- Family relationships become strained because the manipulator has recruited some family members as validators
- You withdraw from social connections to avoid the comparison game
- You're increasingly dependent on the manipulator's perspective as other voices fall away
Research on intimate partner abuse shows that isolation is a predictor of increased control and abuse severity.6 Triangulation achieves isolation while appearing to include multiple people—an insidious paradox.
Chronic Insecurity
Constant comparison and competition create persistent anxiety:
- You're never quite sure if you measure up
- Every interaction with your partner feels like an evaluation
- You monitor your behavior compulsively, trying to avoid unfavorable comparison
- Your self-esteem becomes dependent on outperforming the comparison targets (exes, idealized others, etc.)
This manufactured insecurity serves the manipulator's purposes: insecure partners are less likely to set boundaries, assert needs, or leave.
Relationship Destruction
Triangulation doesn't just damage the primary relationship—it destroys trust in multiple relationships:
- Friendships: When friends are used as flying monkeys or comparison tools, you lose trust in those friendships
- Family bonds: Relatives recruited as validators become complicit in the abuse, damaging family relationships
- New relationships: After experiencing triangulation, you may struggle to trust future partners or fear being compared
The manipulator's tactic creates ripple effects far beyond the primary relationship.
Erosion of Reality Testing
Perhaps most damaging is the impact on your ability to trust your own perceptions:
- You second-guess your feelings ("Maybe I am too sensitive")
- You doubt your memories ("Did I overreact? Maybe it wasn't that bad")
- You defer to others' judgment instead of your own
- You become dependent on external validation instead of internal knowing
This erosion of reality testing can persist long after the relationship ends, requiring dedicated therapeutic work to rebuild confidence in your own perceptions.
How to Recognize Triangulation
Red flags:
- You rarely have conflicts directly; there's always a third party involved
- You frequently hear "So-and-so thinks you..." or "I talked to [third party] and they agree with me"
- You feel like you're competing for your partner's attention with others
- Your partner shares intimate relationship details with people who shouldn't be involved
- You're often being compared unfavorably to ex-partners, friends, or hypothetical others
- Relationship decisions are outsourced to third parties (parents, friends, etc.)
- Children deliver messages between you and your ex
- You feel like you're always outnumbered or "the only one who sees it this way"
- You notice the same patterns of comparison and competition across multiple relationships or contexts
- Third parties seem to have more influence over relationship decisions than you do
- You find yourself defending your perspective to people who weren't present and don't have complete information
Pattern recognition:
One or two instances don't necessarily indicate a pattern. Triangulation as abuse is:
- Frequent and consistent
- Used to avoid accountability
- Deliberately creates insecurity or competition
- Prevents direct, authentic communication
- Results in you feeling powerless or wrong
- Escalates when you attempt to set boundaries or assert needs
- Involves recruiting new third parties when old ones stop being useful
How to Respond to Triangulation
1. Name It
"I notice you often bring up what other people think about our relationship. I'd like us to discuss this directly between us."
Or in co-parenting:**
"Please communicate parenting decisions directly with me, not through the children."
Naming the pattern makes it harder to continue unconsciously (if it's unconscious) or makes the manipulation more obvious (if it's deliberate).
2. Refuse to Engage with Third-Party Opinions
Instead of:** "Your mother doesn't know what she's talking about! She doesn't see what you're really like!"
Try: "What your mother thinks isn't relevant to this conversation between us."
Or:
"I'm not interested in what your ex-wife would have done. I'm interested in what works for us."
Don't defend yourself against the triangulated third party's opinion. Redirect to the actual two-person dynamic.
3. Insist on Direct Communication
In marriage/relationships:** "If you have a problem with how I handle finances, I need you to tell me directly, not discuss it with your mother first."
In co-parenting: "I won't respond to messages delivered through the children. Please use email or the co-parenting app."
In professional contexts: "If your therapist has concerns about my behavior, they should address those in a joint session, not in your individual sessions where I can't respond."
4. Establish Information Boundaries
You get to control what information others have about you:
"I'm not comfortable with you sharing the details of our sex life with your best friend."
"Please don't discuss my mental health history with your family."
"Our financial situation is private between us."
Healthy partners respect these boundaries. Triangulators will:
- Accuse you of being controlling
- Suggest you have something to hide
- Continue doing it anyway
5. Separate Reality from Narrative
Their narrative: "Everyone thinks you're being unreasonable."
Reality check:
- Who is "everyone"? (Usually one or two people they've fed a one-sided story)
- What information do these people have?
- Are these people qualified or appropriate to weigh in?
- Is their opinion actually relevant?
Your mantra: "The only people who need to agree on our relationship are the two of us."
6. In Co-Parenting: Documentation and Parallel Parenting
Document:**
- Instances of triangulation (especially with children)
- Messages delivered through children
- Inappropriate information shared with children
- False narratives fed to third parties
Parallel parent:
- Use co-parenting apps that document communication
- Refuse to engage in conflict through children
- Limit communication to logistics only
- Create boundaries around what information is shared
Seek professional help: If your ex is triangulating children, consult with:
- Your attorney about custody concerns
- A therapist specializing in parental alienation
- Your children's therapist (if appropriate)
7. Build Direct Relationships
With people being triangulated:
Example:** If your partner says "Your sister thinks you're being unreasonable," you might talk to your sister directly:
"Hey, did you and [partner] discuss our conflict about [issue]?"
Often you'll discover:
- The conversation was misrepresented
- Your sister's actual opinion is different
- Your sister didn't realize she was being used as a flying monkey
Exception: Don't do this if it will escalate abuse or put you at risk. Sometimes the best response is strategic distance from people who allow themselves to be used in triangulation.
8. Exit Strategy
If triangulation is persistent and:
- Direct communication attempts are rejected
- The pattern intensifies when you set boundaries
- It's paired with other manipulation or abuse tactics
- Your mental health is suffering
You may be dealing with someone for whom triangulation is a core relationship pattern that won't change. This may be information that helps you decide about the future of the relationship.
Special Consideration: Children as Triangulation Tools
When children are used as:
- Messengers
- Confidantes
- Allies
- Spies
- Emotional support for adult feelings
This is emotional abuse of the children**, not just manipulation of you.
Children deserve:
- Age-appropriate information
- Freedom from adult conflicts
- Relationships with both parents (when safe)
- Childhood without loyalty conflicts
If your ex is triangulating children:
- Never reciprocate (don't use children to send messages back)
- Don't put children in the middle by explaining the triangulation to them
- Provide reassurance ("Grown-up problems are for grown-ups to solve")
- Document for potential legal intervention
- Seek professional help (attorney, therapist, custody evaluator)
When Triangulation Is Subtle
Not all triangulation is obvious. Subtle forms include:
Vague comparisons: "Some people would be grateful for..."
Hypothetical standards: "A normal person would..."
Implied competition: Excessive attention to someone who feels threatening, even without explicit comparison
Emotional affairs: Inappropriate emotional intimacy with third parties that exceeds the primary relationship
Trust your discomfort. If you frequently feel:
- Like you're competing for your partner's attention
- Compared and found wanting
- Like your relationship includes too many other voices
- Like conflicts never stay between you two
These feelings are information worth examining.
Recovery: Healing From Triangulation
Rebuilding Trust in Your Own Perceptions
Years of triangulation can leave you doubting your own reality. "Everyone thinks you're wrong" becomes internalized as "maybe I am wrong."
Recovery requires reclaiming your perceptual authority:
Reality-testing with safe people: Talk through specific incidents with people who weren't involved and don't have a stake in the narrative. A good therapist or trusted friend can help you identify when you're being gaslit through triangulation.
Journaling: Write down what actually happened versus what you're being told happened. Patterns of distortion become clearer on paper.
Example:
What happened: I asked my partner to spend one evening a week together. He said yes, then later told his mother I'm "demanding all his time." His mother called to tell me I'm being controlling.
What I'm being told: I'm unreasonable, demanding, and controlling.
Reality check: One evening together per week is a reasonable request in a marriage. The triangulation (involving his mother in our relationship decisions) is the problem, not my request.
Reconnecting with Alienated Relationships
Triangulation often damages your relationships with people who were used as flying monkeys or who believed the manipulator's narrative about you.
If you want to rebuild these connections:
Approach without blame: "I'd like to talk about what happened between us. I think there may have been some miscommunication or information you received about me that wasn't accurate."
Share your perspective: Not to argue or prove you're right, but to offer the other side: "I want you to know that from my perspective, things looked very different."
Accept that some won't hear you: People deeply invested in the manipulator's narrative may not be willing to question it. That's information about who they are, not evidence that you're wrong.
Focus on relationships worth saving: Not everyone manipulated into taking sides deserves your energy to repair the relationship. Prioritize people who are willing to think critically and hear your truth.
Healing From Comparison Wounds
Being constantly compared unfavorably creates deep insecurity. Recovery involves:
Identifying internalized comparisons: Notice when you catch yourself thinking "I should be more like..." or "Why can't I be as [quality] as [person]?" These are often the manipulator's voice, not yours.
Challenging the comparison trap: Healthy relationships don't require you to be anyone other than yourself. The comparison was a manipulation tactic, not a legitimate assessment of your worth.
Building genuine self-knowledge: Therapy, supportive relationships, and time help you develop a stable sense of self that doesn't require constant external validation or comparison to others.
Recognizing your unique value: You're not interchangeable with the ex, the idealized friend, or the hypothetical perfect partner. Your specific qualities, needs, and boundaries matter. A healthy partner celebrates your uniqueness rather than comparing you to others.
Learning to Recognize Healthy Communication
After triangulation, it can be hard to recognize what normal, healthy two-person communication looks like. Understanding what vulnerability looks like in healthy relationships offers a contrast to the triangulated dynamics where third parties were always present.
Healthy communication includes:
- Direct expression: "I'm frustrated that we haven't spent much time together lately" (not "My friends think you're neglecting me")
- Two-person problem-solving: Working it out between the people involved, not recruiting third parties as validators
- Accepting influence: Both people's perspectives matter; it's not about winning through alliances
- Privacy respect: Relationship conflicts stay between the partners unless both agree to involve others (like a couples therapist)
- Absence of comparison: You're not being held to standards set by other people's behavior
Red flags to watch for in new relationships:
- Frequent references to exes, especially unfavorable comparisons
- Sharing intimate relationship details with people who shouldn't be involved
- Recruiting family or friends to weigh in on relationship decisions
- Creating competition for their attention
- Making you feel like you're always being evaluated against others
You deserve relationships where:
- Conflicts stay between you two
- You're valued for who you are, not compared to who you're not
- Communication is direct, not filtered through third parties
- You feel secure, not in constant competition
For help identifying the green flags of healthy partners and relationships, see our guide to what genuine safety actually looks and feels like after narcissistic abuse.
Your Next Steps
If you're still in the relationship:
- Identify the pattern: who are the typical third parties your partner triangulates?
- Practice refusing to engage with third-party opinions
- Insist on direct, two-person communication
- Notice whether boundaries are respected or violated
- Consider whether this pattern is changeable or core to the relationship
If you're leaving or have left:
- Document triangulation, especially involving children
- Use parallel parenting strategies to minimize triangulation opportunities
- Build direct relationships with people being used as flying monkeys
- Work with professionals who understand high-conflict dynamics
- Protect children from being used as messengers or confidantes
For your wellbeing:
- Work with a therapist to rebuild confidence in your own perceptions
- Practice trusting your reality even when others disagree
- Build relationships with people who communicate directly
- Recognize that healthy relationships don't require constant third-party mediation
Key Takeaways
- Triangulation is bringing third parties into two-person dynamics to avoid direct communication, create competition, and maintain control
- Common forms include comparisons, confidantes, creating rivalries, and using flying monkeys
- It works by creating insecurity, preventing intimacy, and maintaining power imbalances
- Healthy response includes naming it, refusing to engage third-party opinions, and insisting on direct communication
- Children as triangulation tools is emotional abuse requiring documentation and intervention
- Persistent triangulation despite boundary-setting may indicate an unchangeable relationship pattern
- You deserve relationships where conflicts stay between the people involved and communication is direct
If every conversation in your relationship involves other people's opinions, if you're constantly being compared, if you can never just talk to your partner about your partner—you're experiencing triangulation. And you deserve relationships where you're enough, where communication is direct, and where third parties aren't weaponized to keep you insecure and compliant.
Resources
Abuse Education and Support:
- Psychology Today Therapist Finder - Find trauma therapists
- National Domestic Violence Hotline - 1-800-799-7233 (SAFE)
- National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI) - Mental health support
- r/NarcissisticAbuse - Reddit support community
Legal and Family Resources:
- American Bar Association Family Law Section - Find family law attorneys
- Legal Services Corporation - Find free legal aid
- SAMHSA National Helpline - 1-800-662-4357 (24/7)
Crisis Support:
- 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline - Call or text 988 (24/7)
- Crisis Text Line - Text HOME to 741741
References
- Williamson, G. M., Rogge, R. D., & Britt, T. W. (2009). Deception as a core feature of intimate partner violence and a key clinical consideration in related trauma. European Psychologist, 14(2), 95-104. ↩
- Johnson, M. P. (2008). A typology of domestic violence: Intimate terrorism, violent resistance, and situational couple violence. Northeastern University Press. ↩
- Campbell, J. C., Webster, D., Koziol-McLain, J., Block, C., Campbell, D., Curry, M. A., ... & Laughon, K. (2003). Risk factors for femicide in abusive relationships: Results from a multisite case control study. American Journal of Public Health, 93(7), 1089-1097. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1447915/ ↩
- Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed., text rev.). (2022). American Psychiatric Association. Section on narcissistic personality disorder and relationship dynamics. ↩
- Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press. ↩
- Campbell, J. C. (2002). Health consequences of intimate partner violence. Lancet, 359(9314), 1331-1336. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11965295 ↩
- Stark, E. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. Oxford University Press. ↩
- Dutton, D. G., & Painter, S. (1993). Emotional attachments in abusive relationships: A test of traumatic bonding theory. Violence and Victims, 8(2), 105-120. ↩
- Graham-Kevan, N., & Archer, J. (2003). Intimate terrorism and common couple violence: A test of Johnson's predictions in four British samples. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18(11), 1247-1270. ↩
- Bowen, M. (1978). Family therapy in clinical practice. Jason Aronson. ↩
Recommended Reading
Books our editorial team recommends for deeper understanding

Complex PTSD: From Surviving to Thriving
Pete Walker
A comprehensive guide to understanding and recovering from childhood trauma and emotional neglect.

Whole Again
Jackson MacKenzie
How to fully heal from abusive relationships and rediscover your true self after emotional abuse.

The Body Keeps the Score
Bessel van der Kolk, MD
Groundbreaking exploration of how trauma reshapes the brain and body, with innovative treatments for recovery.

Surviving the Storm: When the Court Takes Your Children
Clarity House Press
For fathers in active high-conflict custody battles. Understand your CPTSD symptoms, begin stabilization, and build foundation for healing. 17 chapters covering recognition, symptoms, and the healing path.
As an Amazon Associate, Clarity House Press earns from qualifying purchases. Your price is never affected.
Found this helpful?
Share it with someone who might need it.
About the Author
Clarity House Press
Editorial Team
The editorial team at Clarity House Press curates and publishes evidence-based content on narcissistic abuse recovery, high-conflict divorce, and healing. Our content is informed by research, survivor experiences, and established trauma-informed approaches.
View all posts by Clarity House Press →Published by Clarity House Press Editorial Team



