Please read our important disclaimers before using this content
When friends go silent, family members relay "concerns," and colleagues mention how worried your ex seems—you're not imagining a coordinated campaign. You're experiencing proxy harassment, what the survivor community calls "flying monkeys": third parties recruited, often unknowingly, to extend an abuser's reach and maintain control after you've left or set limits.
Key Takeaways
-
Flying monkeys (what clinicians call proxy harassment or third-party triangulation) are people enlisted to extend an abuser's control, often without realizing they're being manipulated through smear campaigns that begin long before separation
-
DARVO (Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender) becomes exponentially more powerful when deployed through flying monkeys, creating social proof that you're the problem
-
Smear campaigns typically involve planting seeds of doubt years in advance, love bombing potential flying monkeys, and deploying half-truths and lies of omission during separation
-
Flying monkey attacks range from passive information gathering to professional and institutional attacks that carry legal weight and material consequences
-
Don't JADE (Justify, Argue, Defend, Explain) with flying monkeys—they're not seeking information, they're gathering ammunition, and you don't need anyone's permission to protect yourself
-
Strategic silence is often the most powerful response; when you must respond, document boundaries in writing to create a record if harassment escalates
-
Legal options include cease and desist letters, protection order modifications, harassment claims, and court intervention for custody impact—but documentation must be thorough and strategic
-
Enablers include unwitting flying monkeys, willing participants, co-narcissists, enmeshed family members, performative neutrals, and professionals who've been manipulated
-
The grief of losing relationships to flying monkeys is real and valid; rebuilding support networks requires starting over with people who have no connection to your ex and taking relationships slowly
-
When former flying monkeys "wake up," you have no obligation to accept their apology or resume the relationship—watch for genuine accountability versus self-centered confession
-
Children being used as messengers aren't "flying monkeys"—they're victims of parentification and triangulation requiring professional intervention
-
Protecting yourself from proxy harassment isn't about convincing everyone of the truth—it's about restricting access to you and information about you, and building new support systems outside your ex's influence
What Are Flying Monkeys and Enablers?
The survivor community borrowed the term "flying monkeys" from The Wizard of Oz. Flying monkeys are specifically people enlisted to gather information about you, relay messages when you've gone no-contact, pressure you to reconcile, question your version of events, and provide the abuser with validation and attention. Enablers are the broader category: anyone who, through action or inaction, allows, supports, or facilitates narcissistic abuse.
Critical distinction: Many flying monkeys are genuine people who believe they're helping. They've been told a carefully curated version of events where you're the villain and your ex is the victim. Losing these relationships—to people who truly think they're supporting someone in crisis—is one of the most painful aspects of leaving an abusive relationship.
The narcissist didn't destroy you alone. They had help. And that betrayal—by people who should have protected you—cuts deeper than the original abuse in ways you're only beginning to understand.
How Smear Campaigns and Recruitment Work
Before someone becomes a flying monkey, your ex has typically engaged in a smear campaign. Research on narcissistic abuse patterns shows that smear campaigns typically begin long before separation—often months or years in advance.1 The abuser plants seeds of doubt with potential flying monkeys that seem like normal concern: "I'm really worried about Sarah. She's been so anxious lately." By the time you leave, there's already an audience primed to believe their victim narrative.
DARVO—Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender—is a reaction pattern identified by psychologist Jennifer Freyd.2 When deployed through flying monkeys, DARVO becomes exponentially more powerful: multiple people telling you that you're wrong, your version of events contradicted by seemingly independent witnesses, social proof that you're the problem.
Triangulation is a manipulation tactic where the abuser creates triangular relationship dynamics to maintain control.3 Your ex doesn't just manipulate their relationship with you—they manipulate your relationships with everyone else. Research on coercive control shows that highly manipulative individuals often create what amounts to a "cult of personality"—a group of people conditioned to view the abuser as uniquely victimized, defend them reflexively, and distrust anyone who questions their narrative.4 Flying monkeys are cult members who don't realize they're in a cult.
Types of Enablers
Unwitting flying monkeys (mutual friends, in-laws, shared community members) genuinely believe they're helping, operating from incomplete or distorted information.
Codependent enablers are often family members whose entire identity is built on maintaining the family system. They make excuses for the narcissist's behavior, minimize your experiences ("It wasn't that bad," "You're too sensitive"), and pressure you to forgive—because holding the narcissist accountable would destabilize their entire identity.
Performative neutrals claim to "stay out of it" while forcing you to choose between your boundaries and social inclusion. Neutrality in the face of abuse is enablement.
Professionals—attorneys, guardians ad litem, therapists conducting court-ordered reunification therapy, and judges—are the most frightening category because they carry institutional authority and you can't simply cut contact. These professionals aren't inherently corrupt or complicit. Many have been expertly manipulated by someone presenting as a concerned, reasonable parent. The challenge is that their professional role gives weight to their conclusions.
Why People Enable
Social psychology research on cognitive dissonance5 shows that people resolve contradictory beliefs by rejecting whichever belief requires more significant worldview changes. Accepting that your ex is abusive means accepting they were fooled and may have enabled harm. Deciding you're exaggerating requires only that one person is unreliable.
The enabler role is well-documented in addiction research and dysfunctional family systems literature.6 Family systems theory describes how families with a narcissistic member maintain homeostasis through enabling behaviors—with the abuse target as scapegoat, blamed for "causing problems" by resisting. Codependency—a pattern of excessive reliance on another for identity and self-worth—drives much of this enabling.7 Many enmeshed enablers were raised by narcissistic or emotionally unavailable parents; they learned that their value comes from managing others' emotions.
How to Protect Yourself
Information diet: Default to privacy. Assume anything you tell a potential flying monkey may reach your ex. Compartmentalize: different people get different levels of information based on trustworthiness.
Don't JADE (Justify, Argue, Defend, Explain): When a flying monkey confronts you—whether a gentle "concerned" conversation or an aggressive demand for answers—your instinct may be to explain, to make them understand, to prove you're not the villain. This instinct, while natural, often makes things worse. They're not seeking information—they're gathering ammunition. You can't logic someone out of a position they didn't logic themselves into.
❌ JADE: "I tried counseling. We went to three different therapists and he refused to do the work. He wouldn't acknowledge his behavior. I gave him so many chances. The kids were suffering. I had to protect them."
✅ Non-JADE: "I've made my decision and it's final. I'm not discussing it further. If you can't respect that, I'll need to take some space from this friendship."
❌ JADE: "I'm not crazy! I have documentation. Ask my therapist. Here, let me show you these texts where he admits to lying. I can prove I'm telling the truth about what happened."
✅ Non-JADE: "I'm not going to defend myself against those accusations. I know what I experienced. If you've chosen to believe otherwise, that's your decision."
Strategic silence: No response = no ammunition. For third-hand messages, a neutral "Thanks for letting me know" is sufficient. Consistent non-engagement creates a pattern: you don't participate in this dynamic.
Document in writing: When you must set a boundary with someone you'll see regularly, put it in writing. This creates a record if harassment escalates and can be shown to attorneys or courts if the pattern continues.
The Legal Dimension
Flying monkey harassment can be legally actionable,8 particularly when it's part of a coordinated campaign or involves threats, defamation, or interference with custody. Before pursuing legal options, document everything: dates, times, and methods of contact; verbatim or screenshot records; any evidence of coordination; impact on employment, children, and finances.
Legal options to consult with your attorney about:
- Cease and desist letters to specific flying monkeys—most effective when contact has been frequent or aggressive and direct boundaries have been ignored
- Protection order modifications in some jurisdictions to explicitly prohibit third-party contact on the abuser's behalf
- Harassment or stalking claims when coordinated contact meets the legal threshold (typically a high bar requiring substantial documentation)
- Court intervention for custody impact when flying monkey activity is affecting custody proceedings—through motions to exclude testimony, sanctions, or presenting the pattern as evidence of controlling behavior
Legal action should be strategic, not reactive. The goal is protection and peace, not punishment. Sometimes the most powerful legal strategy is thorough documentation without immediate action—creating a record that can be used if needed but doesn't escalate conflict unnecessarily.
Children Being Used as Messengers
The most heartbreaking scenario is when your children are used to gather information or relay messages. This isn't "flying monkey" behavior on the child's part—it's parentification and triangulation, and it's a form of emotional abuse of the child.
Your children are victims in this dynamic, not perpetrators. Never interrogate them about what happens at the other parent's home. Reassure them they don't have to report on you to anyone. Document instances and consult with a therapist who specializes in high-conflict divorce. Focus on what you can control: making your home a safe space where children don't have to perform, report, or choose sides.
Rebuilding Your Support Network
One of the most painful realizations in recovery is discovering how much of your support network was compromised. The isolation can feel crushing.
The grief is real and valid. You didn't lose these relationships through natural drift. They were weaponized against you. You're experiencing disenfranchised grief—loss that others don't recognize or validate. You're allowed to grieve this. You're allowed to be angry. You're allowed to feel the unfairness of losing community while your abuser keeps the audience.
When rebuilding, prioritize people with no connection to your ex. Look for people who understand: support groups for abuse survivors, therapy groups for trauma survivors, online communities for narcissistic abuse recovery. You don't have to explain yourself. They know what "gray rock" and "DARVO" mean. One truly safe friend is worth more than ten "neutral" acquaintances.
When Former Flying Monkeys Come Back
Eventually some flying monkeys will witness your ex's true behavior, experience being discarded themselves, or simply realize your story made more sense. When they reach out, watch for the difference between genuine accountability ("I was wrong, I'm sorry, I should have believed you") and self-centered confession ("I feel so guilty"). Good signs: they take full responsibility, they don't ask you to relive the abuse, they've cut off the narcissist. Red flags: they expect immediate forgiveness, they still center your ex, they gossip about your ex to you.
All of these are valid choices. You don't owe anyone reconciliation just because they've finally seen the truth. Most enablers remain enmeshed in the narcissistic system. Your responsibility is not to wake them up or wait for them to see the truth—it's to protect yourself, heal, and build a life surrounded by people who already see clearly.
You're not losing your mind. You're experiencing a coordinated extension of abuse through people who may genuinely believe they're helping. The crazy-making part is that their good intentions don't change the harm. The solution isn't to convince every flying monkey of the truth—it's to restrict their access to you and the information they seek, and to build new support networks with people who have no stake in your ex's narrative.
The enabling doesn't mean you failed. It means you're facing systems, relationships, and people conditioned (or pathological enough) to participate in your harm. Your job now is to protect yourself, grieve what you've lost, and build a life surrounded by people who already see clearly.
The flying monkeys may never understand. But you already do. And that clarity is the beginning of your freedom.
Resources
Understanding Narcissistic Abuse and Enablers:
- Out of the FOG - Support forum and resources for survivors of personality-disordered abuse
- Dr. Ramani Durvasula's YouTube Channel - Educational videos on narcissistic abuse, flying monkeys, and enablers
- r/NarcissisticAbuse - Reddit community for survivors of narcissistic abuse
- Will I Ever Be Free of You? by Karyl McBride - Navigating narcissistic abuse and its enablers
Legal and Safety Resources:
- National Domestic Violence Hotline - 1-800-799-7233 (support for emotional abuse and harassment)
- Stalking Resource Center - Information on proxy stalking and harassment
- American Bar Association - Find attorneys for restraining orders or cease-and-desist letters
- LawHelp.org - Free and low-cost legal assistance for harassment cases
Therapy and Support Communities:
- Psychology Today - Therapists - Filter for "narcissistic abuse" and "complex trauma"
- EMDR International Association - Find EMDR therapists for processing betrayal trauma
- National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI) - Support groups for trauma and relationship abuse
- SAMHSA Helpline - 1-800-662-4357 (mental health treatment referrals)
References
- Freyd, J. J. (1997). Betrayal-trauma: Traumatic amnesia as an adaptive response to childhood abuse. Feminism & Psychology, 7(1), 103-110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353597007001009 ↩
- Afifi, T. D., & Hutchinson, S. (2005). Understanding and managing the dialectical tensions in the stepparent stepchild relationship. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 44(3-4), 109-122. Also: Bowen, M. (1978). Family Therapy in Clinical Practice. Jason Aronson. Referenced in "Same Family, Divergent Realities: How Triangulation Preserves Parents' Illusory Harmony while Adolescents Navigate Interparental Conflicts." PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8336947/ ↩
- Harsey, S. J., Zurbriggen, E. L., & Freyd, J. J. (2017). Perpetrator responses to survivor disclosures of adults who experienced institutional betrayal. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 18(4), 528-542. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299732.2016.1211162 ↩
- Tolmie, Smith, & Wilson (2024). Understanding Intimate Partner Violence: Why Coercive Control Requires a Social and Systemic Entrapment Framework.. Violence against women. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10666472/ ↩
- Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press. Referenced in "Cognitive Dissonance: Where We've Been and Where We're Going." International Review of Social Psychology, 38(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.277 ↩
- Timko, C. (2013). Enmeshment and undifferentiation: The Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 45(2), 177-179. Also: Bowen, M. (1975). Family Theory in Clinical Practice. Jason Aronson. Referenced in "Enmeshment: another name for Bowen's undifferentiated self." PubMed, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1475166/ ↩
- Lim, S. L., & Courtney, R. (2009). Family of origin and current relationship influences on enmeshment. Journal of Family Psychology, 23(6), 803-813. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016915 ↩
- Harsey, S. J., & Freyd, J. J. (2023). The influence of Deny, Attack, and Reverse Victim and Offender and insincere apologies on perceptions of sexual assault. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 24(4), 1858-1875. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605231169751 ↩
Recommended Reading
From Clarity House Press — plus trusted books for deeper understanding

Disarming the Narcissist
Wendy T. Behary, LCSW
Schema therapy techniques to survive and thrive with the self-absorbed person in your life.

The Gift of Fear
Gavin de Becker
Survival signals that protect us from violence and recognizing warning signs.
As an Amazon Associate, Clarity House Press earns from qualifying purchases. Your price is never affected.
Found this helpful?
Share it with someone who might need it.
About the Author
Clarity House Press
Editorial Team
The editorial team at Clarity House Press curates and publishes evidence-based content on narcissistic abuse recovery, high-conflict divorce, and healing. Our content is informed by research, survivor experiences, and established trauma-informed approaches.
View all posts by Clarity House Press →Published by Clarity House Press Editorial Team






